Houston, TX Booking May 2026 projects 3 client slots remaining Free homepage redesign for qualified businesses 14-day money back guarantee Launching in 4 weeks or less Houston, TX Booking May 2026 projects 3 client slots remaining Free homepage redesign for qualified businesses 14-day money back guarantee Launching in 4 weeks or less
Live build · Web Design Studio · Houston, TX

How we built our own studio site — every decision, documented.

The site you're reading right now. We figured if we're going to ask prospects to trust us with their $1,500, the most honest thing we could do was show them the thinking behind our own website. Here is every meaningful decision and trade-off.

Client
Scope
Timeline
Platform

The starting point

Avoxan is a brand-new web design studio. Zero clients on day one. No testimonials. No portfolio. We needed a website that did the work a salesperson would normally do: convince a small business owner that a new studio with no track record was a safer bet than a $400 freelancer or a $15,000 agency.

The constraint: a single page (with a blog and case studies) that had to handle awareness, education, objection-handling, social proof, and conversion all at once.

The strategy

Three principles shaped every decision:

  1. Be honest about what we are. Pretending to be a 10-person agency would have backfired the moment a prospect asked a basic question on a call. The site openly states we're a small studio with founding-client pricing.
  2. Make the $1,500 feel obvious, not cheap. The risk at this price point isn't "too expensive" — it's "what's the catch?" Every section is designed to answer that question.
  3. Anticipate every objection in the FAQ and prove the process through case studies. A new studio can't lean on testimonials. So we lean on transparency.

Design decisions worth explaining

Typography: Fraunces + Geist + JetBrains Mono

Fraunces is a variable serif with extensive optical-size and softness axes — meaning the same font behaves like a confident display face at 80px and like a refined book-text face at 14px. It signals "we care about craft" without being precious. Geist is Vercel's modern sans-serif: clean, geometric, neutral. JetBrains Mono in small doses gives the page a technical-but-warm feel.

We deliberately avoided the most overused agency fonts of 2025-2026 (Inter, Space Grotesk, Söhne). Picking less-common fonts is a small but real differentiator.

Color: cream, ink, sienna — and nothing else

One warm base (cream), one anchor (deep ink black), one accent (burnt sienna), with two muted support tones for type hierarchy. Three colors total. Most agency sites use 6-8. Restraint reads as confidence.

The cream background instead of pure white is intentional: white feels clinical and "default tech startup." Cream feels editorial, warm, and slightly premium. It also reduces eye strain on long-form reading — which matters because we want prospects to read the blog and case studies.

The grain overlay

An SVG noise filter is layered over the entire page at 35% opacity. It adds a subtle paper-like texture that makes the page feel less digital. Tiny detail, big effect.

Conversion architecture — section by section

Hero

Most agency heroes say "We build beautiful websites." Ours says "Websites that quietly do the selling for you." Outcome-led, not feature-led. The "no sales pressure, we'll tell you straight if you don't need a website" subhead is a trust-builder you almost never see on agency sites — and it's the kind of line that prospects screenshot and send to their business partner.

The Problem section (black background)

Most websites pitch first. We name the prospect's pain first. "Most small business websites are expensive brochures that nobody reads" is the kind of sentence the visitor has been quietly thinking. Saying it out loud earns permission to be heard.

The 8-item offer stack

This is the most strategically important section. Each item has a "fake retail price" crossed through ($1,200, $800, $450...) that totals roughly $5,400. The actual price is $1,500. This is a classic value-anchoring technique used by every infomercial and high-end consulting offer, because it works.

The line-item prices aren't fabricated — they're realistic standalone prices for those services from competing providers. If a prospect priced these pieces individually, they would in fact pay $4,500-$5,500.

Why this matters more than discounts

"Was $5,400, now $1,500" is psychologically different from "$1,500." The first feels like winning. The second feels like just spending money. People don't buy on absolute prices; they buy on relative perceived value.

Pricing section

Single price card, no tiers. Most agencies show three pricing tiers — Starter / Growth / Premium — which forces the prospect into evaluation mode. One price, one offer, one decision. Easier to say yes to.

Three guarantees in burnt sienna

The loudest visual section of the entire site. Risk reversal is the single biggest lever for closing sales to skeptical small business owners. The "$200 refund if we miss our 4-week deadline" and "90-day inquiry promise" aren't standard for the industry. We put them in writing because (a) we mean them and (b) prospects screenshot guarantees more than they screenshot pricing.

FAQ — strategically question-led

Each FAQ targets a specific objection AND a specific search query. "Why is your pricing lower than other agencies?" handles the "what's the catch" concern AND ranks for the actual search "why is web design so cheap." Same with "How much does a small business website cost in 2026?" which we cover in the blog too.

SEO + AI search infrastructure

  • JSON-LD schema for ProfessionalService, FAQPage, and Blog with 6 BlogPosting entries
  • Six blog articles, each 1,500-2,500 words, each question-led headline
  • TL;DR blocks at the top of every article (designed to be the snippet AI tools quote)
  • Internal linking between blog articles and the offer/process/contact sections
  • Open Graph and Twitter card meta tags for social sharing
  • Sub-2-second page load on mobile, sub-1-second on desktop
  • Accessible HTML structure with semantic landmarks

What's deliberately NOT on this site

  • Fake testimonials. We're a new studio. Lying about reviews would be both legally exposed (FTC + Texas DTPA) and strategically dumb (one Reddit post and the brand dies).
  • Stock photos of "diverse team in modern office." Every small agency uses these. They scream "template."
  • A live chat widget. We don't want to over-promise instant response. A real call is the conversion event.
  • Pop-ups, exit-intent modals, newsletter overlays. None of these convert well for $1,500+ services and they damage brand trust.
  • "As featured in" logo strips. We aren't featured anywhere yet. We'll add them when we are.

The honest part: what would I change if I were a different studio?

If we had 20 real testimonials, the structure would change — testimonials would move higher and replace some of the risk-reversal content. If we had a long client list, the case studies section would lead instead of the offer stack. If we were charging $5,000+, the entire tone would shift to luxury minimalism with less direct copy.

Every website is a strategic argument. This one's argument is: "We're new, we're transparent about it, here's exactly what you get, here's the exact risk we'll absorb, book a call."

The bill of materials

  • Brand & visual identity (logo, color, type system) — $2,200
  • Custom homepage design (single long page) — $2,500
  • Copywriting (hero through FAQ) — $1,800
  • Six long-form blog articles ($300-450 each) — $2,200
  • Four case studies ($400-600 each) — $1,900
  • Schema + AI search optimization — $700
  • Hand-coded HTML/CSS build (no framework) — $1,800
  • Total at agency rates: ~$13,100

And, ironically, this exact build is what we'd deliver for a client at $1,500 — minus the level of meta-detail in this case study itself. Which is what you should expect.

Where the actual 52 hours went

  • Strategy, positioning, sitemap — 5 hours
  • Brand & visual identity (logo, type, color system) — 4 hours
  • Copywriting (homepage from hero through FAQ) — 9 hours
  • Six blog articles — 12 hours
  • Four case studies (this one took 3 hours alone) — 8 hours
  • Design in Figma — 6 hours
  • Hand-coded HTML/CSS build — 6 hours
  • Schema, accessibility, QA, mobile testing — 2 hours

Want this kind of thinking applied to your business?

Every site we build gets the same depth of decision-making documented here. If that's the kind of partner you want, book a 20-minute call.

Book a call →
Keep going

You’ve seen one. See another.

Next chapter — What's next

Read the field notes

Eight long-form essays on the questions clients actually ask: pricing, conversion, SEO, AI search, platforms, and niche teardowns.

Read on

Let's see if a website is what you actually need.

Book a 20-minute call. No slide deck, no sales pressure. We'll ask about your business and tell you straight whether Avoxan can help — or whether your money is better spent somewhere else.

Book a free 20-min call
3 slots remaining for May 2026